Page 115 - FBL AR 2019-20
P. 115

CORPORATE   STATUTORY  FINANCIAL
                                                                                        OVERVIEW  STATEMENTS  STATEMENTS



               and Audit) Rules, 2014, as amended, prescribed by the Central   Tax and other material statutory dues applicable to it with
               Government under section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013,   the appropriate authorities.
               and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed cost   (b)  There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
               records have been made and maintained. We have, however,   Provident Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Income-tax,
               not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a   Customs duty, Goods and Services Tax and other material
               view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.
                                                                      statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2020 for a period
            (vii)  According to the information and explanations given to us, in   of  more  than  six  months  from  the  date  they  became
               respect of statutory dues:                             payable.
               (a)  The Company has been regular in depositing undisputed   (c)  According to the records of the Company, the dues of
                   statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees’ State   Sales Tax and Service Tax on account of disputes as on
                   Insurance, Income-tax, Customs duty, Goods and Services   March 31, 2020 are given below:

            Statute        Nature of Dues  Forum where dispute   Period to which the   Amount involved    Amount paid under
                                              is pending      amount relates     (H In Lakhs)*  protest (H In Lakhs)
                 (1)            (2)              (3)               (4)              (5)               (6)
            The Gujarat   Sales tax and penalty  Sales Tax Appellate   1992-1994    4.63              -
            Sales Tax Act                      Tribunal
            Central Excise   Service tax and   High Court, Bombay  2000-2001       18.75             3.75
            Act, 1944         penalty

            *Net of amount paid under protest disclosed in column (6)

            (viii) In our opinion and according to the information and   party transactions have been disclosed in the standalone
               explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the   financial statements as required by the applicable Indian
               repayment of loans or borrowings to financial institutions and   Accounting Standards.
               banks. The Company has not taken any loans or borrowings   (xiv) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential
               from government and has not issued any debentures.
                                                                   allotment  or  private  placement  of  shares  or  fully  or  partly
            (ix)  In our opinion and according to the information and   convertible debentures and hence reporting under clause
               explanations given to us, money raised by way of the term   3(xiv) of the Order is not applicable.
               loans have been applied by the Company during the year for   (xv)  In our opinion and according to the information and
               the purposes for which they were raised. The Company has not   explanations given to us, during the year, the Company has
               raised money by way of initial public offer or further public offer   not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors
               (including debt instruments).
                                                                   or directors of its holding, subsidiary or associate companies or
            (x)  To the best of our knowledge and according to the information   persons connected with them and hence provisions of section
               and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no   192 of the Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable.
               material fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has   (xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section
               been noticed or reported during the year.
                                                                   45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
            (xi)  In our opinion and according to the information and
               explanations given to us, the Company has paid / provided
               managerial remuneration  in accordance  with  the  requisite             For Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP
               approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with                   Chartered Accountants
               Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.
                                                                                (Firm’s Registration No. 117366W/W-100018)
            (xii)  The Company is not a Nidhi Company and hence reporting
               under clause 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.
                                                                                               Rajesh K. Hiranandani
            (xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and                                    Partner
               explanations given to us, the Company is in compliance with   Place: Mumbai    (Membership No. 36920)
               sections 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, where   Date: August 28, 2020   (UDIN: 20036920AAAACU7943)
               applicable, for all transactions with the related parties identified
               by the Management of the Company and the details of related









                                                                                                             113
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120